Research supervision
We are accepting research students – Honours, Master, and PhD
We welcome proposals from prospective candidates for Honours, Research Master, or PhD Projects on misinformation, AI and society from Philosophy, Communication and Media Studies, Political Science, Social Theory and related disciplines. We specialise in interdisciplinary projects and supervision. For Master and PhD candidates full scholarships are available (on a competitive basis).
Please contact us if you’re interested in completing a research degree with us.
Email A.Schwenkenbecher@murdoch.edu.au or Tauel.Harper@murdoch.edu.au for more info
See also https://www.murdoch.edu.au/study/study-levels/research
Current research projects
These are projects we are currently conducting in the Cluster and for which we especially welcome research student applications:
Information ecologies: De-individualising our responses to misinformation
This interdisciplinary project focuses on developing better responses to misinformation and disinformation by understanding them as fundamentally social phenomena. This means that both for explaining how these problems emerge and for addressing them a shift in our focus is required from individual agents to our epistemic environments. The project will develop conceptual and practical tools for fostering healthy epistemic environments as a social epistemic responsibility. Candidates with a background in either Philosophy (Social Epistemology), Politics or Communication Studies are welcome to apply – willingness to engage with research across disciplines is an essential requirement. Demonstrated ability for interdisciplinary research is an advantage.
Information ecologies and participatory and deliberative democratic responses
The digital public sphere has unique features that enable creative and experimental modes of participation in deliberation, nationally and globally. Yet disorders and pathologies such as platform concentration, algorithmic censorship and filtering, and a pressing need for information veracity while maintaining a capacity for contestation and critique, present a challenge for the democratic quality of the public sphere. These information ecologies can be both empowering and disordered. What would responses based on participatory and deliberative democracy offer to address these challenges? We invite candidates with a background in political theory, political science, or communication studies to develop a project on responses based on participatory and deliberative democracy. Research can span a range of interests such as fact-checking communities, civil society efforts, or government or business commissioned processes.
The epistemic conditions of corporate ethical responsibility
In order to act on their social and ethical responsibilities, corporate agents – which include for-profit and not-for-profit organizations, but also public institutions such as universities – must be internally constituted in a way that allows them to be effective agents in the first place. This imposes certain requirements on their organisational structure with regard to information flow and distribution. The greater a corporate agent’s complexity the greater is the risk of internal failures in agency, in particular with regard to norms of rationality such as coherence and consistency. There is an emerging literature concerning the role of structural elements in triggering failures of moral agency. The goal of the project is to (1) develop a better understanding of structural epistemic failings of corporate agency, (2) conduct a series of case studies, in order to (3) design practice-relevant guidelines to identify and repair such flaws in corporate structures.
Current research students
Edmund Hassel (2026 – ): How to define propaganda in the modern world ? PHD project
Supervisors: Tauel Harper and Anne Schwenkenbecher
Abstract: In today’s age, thanks to the rapid development of the internet and social media technologies, information travels fast and is available in abundance. Just as good information travels quickly, so does poor information, disinformation and misinformation. As such, propaganda has become a prolific phenomenon with the advancement of communication technology. Propaganda is directly linked to the increasing polarisation of the western political spectrum, online echo chambers, and a distrust in both governments and epistemic institutions like universities. The contribution of my PhD to the study of propaganda will be a concrete universal definition of it from across the literature studying propaganda for the last 400 years. With a firmly established definition in place, it should make propaganda more easily recognisable. This would help epistemic institutions and governments be better able to make laws and media literacy studies to help combat malicious propaganda. However, assuming I fail to form an adequate definition, I will delve deep into the literature on propaganda to ascertain why this term is so indefinable. Either way, I hope to more concretely understand the phenomenon of propaganda, which is omnipresent in our current age.
Completed research student projects
Edmund Hassel (2025): When does Less Equal More in Zollman’s Network Model? HONOURS project
Supervisors: Tauel Harper and Anne Schwenkenbecher
Abstract: We are more connected than ever and have access to an abundance of information thanks to the internet. According to a widely accepted view, access to large amounts of information will allow us to arrive at a well-informed conclusion. This is an assumption that has existed at least from the time of John Stuart Mill (1885). However, this assumption has been questioned by the philosopher Kevin Zollman. He demonstrated that a community with access to less information and fewer connections between community members can potentially surpass a community with access to more information/connections when it comes to scientific inquiry. Zollman suggests that this result emerges as, in communities with more connections, information travels quicker, which can guide that community to a potentially erroneous consensus. Alternatively, in communities with less connections, information travels slowly, allowing that community to explore alternatives and come to the correct consensus. Prima facie, this result, which emerges from a computer simulation representing a scientific community, appears surprising. As a result, the validity of Zollman’s study has been called into question, not least because it simplifies and idealises aspects of a scientific community. In this dissertation, I will explore when Zollman’s conclusion holds by assessing a variety of models that developed from his. Then I will question the validity of his model based on the measures used to validate models in the wider modelling literature. Even if Zollman’s model fails to be validated, I will argue that we can still draw epistemic value from it if we zoom out from scientific communities and focus on general communities engaged in inquiry.
